Re: batch inserts are "slow"
От | Tim Terlegård |
---|---|
Тема | Re: batch inserts are "slow" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0505031942180.8117-100000@naskur.se.linux.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: batch inserts are "slow" (Christopher Petrilli <petrilli@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: batch inserts are "slow"
Re: batch inserts are "slow" |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > I'm converting an application to be using postgresql instead of oracle. > > There seems to be only one issue left, batch inserts in postgresql seem > > significant slower than in oracle. I have about 200 batch jobs, each > > consisting of about 14 000 inserts. Each job takes 1.3 seconds in > > postgresql and 0.25 seconds in oracle. With 200 jobs this means several > > more minutes to complete the task. By fixing this I think the > > application using postgresql over all would be faster than when using > > oracle. > > Just as on Oracle you would use SQL*Loader for this application, you > should use the COPY syntax for PostgreSQL. You will find it a lot > faster. I have used it by building the input files and executing > 'psql' with a COPY command, and also by using it with a subprocess, > both are quite effective. I tried this now. Now it's down to 0.45 seconds. It feels a bit hacky to run /usr/bin/psql from java, but it sure works. Thanks for the hint! Tim
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: