Re: Bug with view definitions?
От | Dennis Bjorklund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug with view definitions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0407011325440.21809-100000@zigo.dhs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bug with view definitions? (Justin Clift <jc@telstra.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug with view definitions?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Justin Clift wrote: > Not sure if this is a known issue or not, but I think I may have found a > bug with the way view definitions are shown... at least in psql. > > Using 7.5 development CVS (as of a few hours ago) or even 7.4.3, if I > connect using it's version of psql to a database (of the same version), > then use psql to view the information_schema.constraint_columns_usage > view, it gives me this definition: [long view defintion from \d information_schema.constraint_column_usage] The thing that does not work is that the SELECT to the left of the UNION ALL needs to be put inside (), then it works and the parser can parse it. Looking at the doc page it looks like the () should not be needed but one need to check real grammar (specification) to really know how it should be parsed. -- /Dennis Björklund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: