Re: locale
От | Dennis Bjorklund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: locale |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0404082109340.4551-100000@zigo.dhs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: locale (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: locale
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > You're missing the point: strcoll() is not going to compare them as > latin1 strings. It's going to interpret the bytes as utf-8 strings, > because that's what LC_CTYPE will tell it to do. My current understanding of what you are saying now is that LC_CTYPE is always UTF-8 and all comparisons in the new database are going to be wrong. This since all strings will be compared as if they where UTF-8. LC_CTYPE is per cluster and not per database as some of the other LC_xxxx. Yes, this actually makes sense. I really hope that this is the way it work because I think I can understand this. I don't like it, but I can understand what pg currently do, which is good (unless pg does something else :-) Thanks for the explanation. -- /Dennis Björklund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: