Re: Commercial binary support?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commercial binary support? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311220946160.17003-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commercial binary support? ("Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commercial binary support?
Re: Commercial binary support? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Does that mean I have supplied Logictree Systems PostgreSQL? PostgreSQL with > Logictree Systems TSearch2? Actually to some degree, yes. Of course a lot would depend on the type of contract you have with them you may be "responsible" for that code. However, I would love to see those patches. Sincerely, Joshua Drake And if I'd made no modifications to the code? I > suppose I could have insisted that a separate contract be taken for the supply > and support on top of the app. development contract. In fact, having written > that I'm starting to think that should be the case. > > > > It is purely a business thing, liability and the like. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Joshua Drake > > > > > > Nigel J. Andrews wrote: > > > > >On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > >>>>>providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own > > >>>>>supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several > > >>>>companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL > > >>>>and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >I don't even know what it means. If I were to build the 7.4 source, install it > > >somewhere, tarball it up would that then count as providing our own supported > > >binaries (assuming the support service is also offered of course)? Surely it's > > >fairly common for someone to sell support and be happy to include the service > > >of supplying the binaries so if requested, what's so special about it? > > > > > > -- > Nigel Andrews > > -- Co-Founder Command Prompt, Inc. The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: