Re: RHEL
От | Craig O'Shannessy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RHEL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311131551150.14188-100000@mail.ucw.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RHEL (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: RHEL
Re: RHEL |
Список | pgsql-general |
So, what ever happened to the "RedHat database"? I though RH was going to be hiring core PostgreSQL developers? Anyone got a URL to explain what happened to this venture? Sorry if I'm getting a little OT here. Craig On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > > Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com> writes: > > > I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can > > > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES > > > Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this. > > > (Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's > > internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres. > > I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may > > be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.) > > The RHEL3 beta (taroon) had rh-postgresql-server built and included. Does > RHEL3 not include this package? >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: