Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL
От | Michael Pohl |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310201119240.10378-100000@server1.techplant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Which is faster SQL or PL/PGSQL
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Christopher Browne wrote: > The world rejoiced as jinujosein@yahoo.com ("George A.J") wrote: > > i am converting an MSSQL database to Postgres. there is a lot of > > procedures to convert. > > > > which language is best for functions, SQL or plpgsql. > > > > which is faster . i am using postgres 7.3.2 > > Hmm? This doesn't seem to make much more sense than the question of > what colour a database should be ("Mauve has more RAM..."). Transact-SQL stored procedures pseudo-compile their execution plans the first time they are run, which can result in faster subsequent executions. I'm guessing the poster was wondering if plpgsql functions offered similar performance benefits vs. equivalent SQL. michael
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: