Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
От | Michael Pohl |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0309150931480.9553-100000@server1.techplant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexey Borzov wrote: > Thus much praise goes to Ian for compiling his excellent "gotchas" list > that can help a lot in flaming. But I see no such use for "the bullet > list": I don't see target audience for it. I disagree. > There are 2 sorts of people using MySQL: > 1) Those who know several RDBMSs and use it only when it is the best > tool for the job (read-only web DB, storing logs, etc) > 2) Those who know only MySQL and think that it is the Ultimate Solution > for Everything. 3) Programmers (read: not db experts) who started with MySQL by default or by recommendation, but who would be persuaded by an objective, non-FUD comparison to a more capable free RDBMS. This is the category I fell into three years ago. Ian's bullet list would have saved me a lot of research back then. As a side note, I appreciate the PgSQL community's apparent commitment to avoid both FUD and overstatement of PgSQL's capabilities. michael
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: