Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
От | Michael Pohl |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0307062249060.8634-100000@server1.techplant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... ("Matthew Nuzum" <cobalt@bearfruit.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003...
Re: Moving postgresql.conf tunables into 2003... |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > At the very least, if there is good documentation for these parameters, > maybe the conf file should provide a link to this info. I believe that is what Josh is proposing: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-07/msg00102.php > [Apache httpd] uses a three phase (if not more) documentation level. > The .conf file contains detailed instructions in an easy to read and > not-to-jargon-ish structure. The docs provide detailed tutorials and > papers that expand on configuration params in an easy to read format. > Both of these refer to the thorough reference manual that breaks each > possible option down into it's nitty gritty details so that a user can > get more information if they so desire. I agree that Apache's approach is primo. Often the .conf comments are enough to jog my memory about a directive I haven't used for a while. Or the comments are enough to let me know I don't need a directive, or that I need to go to the manual and read more. I appreciate that. michael
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: