Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Adam Witney wrote:

> >> t/03bind............ok
> >> t/04execute.........ok 9/13*** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20:
> >> Incorrect checksum for freed object - object was probably modified after
> >> being freed; break at szone_error
> >> *** malloc[20356]: error for object 0x235c20: Incorrect checksum for freed
> >> object - object was probably modified after being freed; break at
> >> szone_error
> >> t/04execute.........dubious
> >>         Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb)
> >> DIED. FAILED tests 10-13
> >>         Failed 4/13 tests, 69.23% okay
> > 
> > I do not like the looks of this.  Did this test fail with DBD::Pg 1.21?
> 
> Just downloaded, built and tested DBD-Pg-1.21 with no problems.
> 

I don't see why 1.21 should work while 1.22 failes, so all I can say is
If 1.21 works, use it.   If you see this 1.21, you might want to 
try what is in CVS because much of the prepare, quoting and execute code 
was rewritten and might have fixed the issue.

> > I ran into this on my system also. There is a if $version >7.x where I
> > can't remember what x is. Anyway the regex that pulls version gets "7.3.2"
> > which can't be used as a number so perl warns you.  I will write up a
> > patch for this later today. Grrr.
> 
> I had a look myself... Its this one
> 
> $version < 7.3
> 

Yup, looks like someone put in a patch to fix that already.


-r