Re: Lots o' I/O
От | Clarence Gardner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lots o' I/O |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0302141610131.21703-100000@liberty.sba2.netlojix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lots o' I/O (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lots o' I/O
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Clarence Gardner wrote: > > > > > I have a database that was populated about two months ago, and one > > particular table has begun causing problems. It's got about 20,000 > > records, all fixed length of about 1 kbytes. If we do any operation > > that involves a sequential scan of that table (e.g., select count(*)), > > it now takes about 20 seconds, and according to linux vmstat, reads > > 275000 disk blocks (275 mbytes). The database is vacuumed each night. > > What does vacuum full verbose <table> show? And how big is the actual > data file? > The FULL made the difference -- the table now performs like the copy. Despite a nightly vacuum analyze, we've never done a vacuum full. The docs (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=0&file=sql-vacuum.html) almost, but not quite, come out against it.... We're going to do a full vacuum weekly now. Thanks, all.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: