Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209101753000.3964-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane dijo: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Henry's regex work is the same code that is in *BSD regex (at least > > BSD/OS, FreeBSD, NetBSD), which I have found to be pretty slow in > > certain complex cases, > > You're speaking of his *old* package (the one we currently use), no? > > Friedl seems to think that the current Tcl regex engine (Henry's new > code) is the most advanced thing on the planet. Oh, so the TODO item "replace with newer code" is not just vaporware? Well, I won't try to compete with Spencer's code in that case. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>) "Linux transformó mi computadora, de una `máquina para hacer cosas', en un aparato realmente entretenido, sobre el cual cada día aprendo algo nuevo" (Jaime Salinas)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: