Re: pg_stat_reset round 3
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_reset round 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208060212020.5523-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_reset round 3 ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne dijo: > > Interesting that all callable function must return a type. I did: > > > > test=> select proname from pg_proc where prorettype = 0; > > > > and none of the functions with 0 prorettype can be called from psql. I > > guess boolean is the best we can do. I guess because it is a function > > it has to return something. > > Yeah, because otherwise what does the SELECT return? It has to return at > least one column? It would be odd to just go SELECT blah() and have the > prompt just come back to you. However, it would be nice to be able to go > "CALL blah()" and have it return nothing except maybe a 'CALL' string. What's so bad about returning a SQL NULL in SELECT ? Seems an arbitrary limitation to me. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>) "El hombre nunca sabe de lo que es capaz hasta que lo intenta" (C. Dickens)
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: