Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208021257050.28034-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL ("Marshall Spight" <marshall@meetstheeye.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Marshall Spight wrote: > "Curt Sampson" <cjs@cynic.net> wrote in message news:Pine.NEB.4.44.0207131908540.454-100000@angelic.cynic.net... > > > > Well, yeah, but it's really time to kill, properly, this idea that > > postgres is always slower than mysql. I'm reasonably convinced that > > under fairly heavy OLTP loads with some large queries going, MySQL would > > grind to a halt at loads much less than postgres can handle. > > We did a bunch of benchmarking at work, using real datasets from > our application, as well as synthetic benchmarks. A very wide > variety of db operations were measured, using postgres, and mysql > with innodb and myisam tables. > > Although I am a huge postgres fan, and will not be switching myself, > I have to admit that as far as a race goes, mysql is the clear winner. > In our tests, it was drastically faster than postgres. It really bummed > me out. Just wondering what version of postgresql you were running, and how much optimization was done to the postgresql.conf file before testing, as the default is really quite lowest common denominator.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: