Re: index use again and again
От | Holger Marzen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index use again and again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0202121636150.18491-100000@bluebell.marzen.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index use again and again (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: index use again and again
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Holger Marzen <holger@marzen.de> writes: > > Are 152428 rows not enough to use the index? > > More like "there are too many rows to use the index". > > You've got a query that is estimated to hit 22322/152428 = 15% of the > table. If the rows in question are uniformly scattered through the > table then the system will certainly have to read every block of the > table to get them all. It may as well read the table sequentially, > rather than do the extra I/O to read the index too. You're right. When the result is small, the index is used. When the number of rows is a little bit higher and postgres uses a table scan, the query is much slower. The table is not very unordered. Can I force postgres to raise the limit where it starts scanning the whole table? -- PGP/GPG Key-ID: http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB5A1AFE1
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: