Re: psql possible TODO
От | Richard Troy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql possible TODO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0612051539230.27353-100000@denzel.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql possible TODO (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql possible TODO
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > O.k. what about \s# ? Or something like that... Where \s is the good old > > fashioned way, and \s# is my new fandango way? > > That's got a meaning already (any argument to \s is the file name to write). > > I suppose that if you didn't mind making the command behave > non-orthogonally, you could have "\s" print line numbers while > "\s file" doesn't. Not sure if that's a good idea or not ... Hi Tom, Josh, Frankly, I don't care about this much, though I tend to lean _against_ numbered querys, however, it occurs to me that perhaps Josh can implement a command line switch to turn on command line numbering. He gets what he wants, you get what you want, and the world has a tiny bit more functionality. It seems to me foolish to change what exists today, but _adding_ an option seems reasonable if someone wants to impelent it. Rgds, Richard -- Richard Troy, Chief Scientist Science Tools Corporation 510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263 rtroy@ScienceTools.com, http://ScienceTools.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: