Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks
От | Richard Troy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0612011106130.27353-100000@denzel.in обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > So at this point we are facing three options: > - throw in a large and poorly tested "fix" at the last moment; > - postpone 8.2 until we can think of a real fix, which might > be a major undertaking; > - ship 8.2 with the same behavior 8.0 and 8.1 had. > None of these are very attractive, but I'm starting to think the last > is the least bad. > > regards, tom lane I'd go with that last option; it's important to get this release out now, I think, as it has a lot of value add, and people get it that things aren't always perfect. I do, however, feel that the "real fix" is vital, whenever it can occur. It's attention to detail like this that elevates this group from good to great. Richard -- Richard Troy, Chief Scientist Science Tools Corporation 510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263 rtroy@ScienceTools.com, http://ScienceTools.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: