Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0403261705140.9396-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgres eating CPU on HP9000 (Fabio Esposito <nfesposi@sourceweave.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Fabio Esposito wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, scott.marlowe wrote: > > > > It maintains 48hours of data, so its not a large database; roughly > > > <600mbs. We do this by running a housekeeping program in a cron job. > > > It deletes all data older then 48hours, then vaccuum analyzes. It will > > > also preform a reindex if the option is set before it vaccuum's. > > > > > This almost sounds like a problem (fixed in 7.4 I believe) where some > > system catalog indexes would get huge over time, and couldn't be vacuumed > > or reindexed while the database was up in multi-user mode. > > > > I'll defer to Tom or Bruce or somebody to say if my guess is even close... > > > We haven't tried 7.4, I will experiment with it next week, I hope it > will be that simple. In the meantime, a simple dump - reload into a test box running your current version may provide some insight. If it fixes the problem, then you likely do have some kind of issue with index / table growth that isn't being addressed by vacuuming.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: