Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0402121657540.6465-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross Database and Cross Schema ? (Stef <stef@chronozon.artofdns.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Query Planner making a distinction between Cross
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Stef wrote: > > > case in point, the example trigger. i would have expected > > > deliberate schemaname.table during an insert to work, but > > > instead the parser complains about cross-database. > > > > I would think just changing the error message to "no schema by the name of > > suchandsuch found" would make it pretty clear. > > > > indeed, the only problem being, that this is a > -deliberately- called schema and it does exist > jst that its not in the search_path. surely the > pl/pglsql or parser should be able to search the > schemanames if i give it a -deliberate- name and > if it isnt there say 'not found' ? > > so, either thats an error (improper parsing/expr > forming) in the pl/pgsql trigger code, or, well, > i dont know. > > thoughts ? comments ? barking mad ? Hmmm. I would think the first step would be to simply change the cross-db queries aren't supported to one of "schema either does not exist or is not in the search path".
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: