Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0402031014290.23676-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Christopher Browne wrote: > > >In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, JanWieck@Yahoo.com (Jan Wieck) transmitted: > > > > > >>Josh Berkus wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I've had requests from a couple of businesses to see results of > >>>infomal MySQL > >>>+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL tests. I know that we don't have the setup > >>>to do full formal benchmarking, but surely someone in our community > >>>has gone head-to-head on your own application? > >>> > >>> > >>how does someone compare an Apache+PHP+MySQL "thing" against something > >>implemented with half the stuff done in stored procedures and the > >>entire business model guarded by referential integrity, custom > >>triggers and whatnot? > >> > >>Seriously, I am tired of this kind of question. You gotta get bold > >>enough to stand up in a "meeting" like that, say "guy's, you can ask > >>me how this compares to Oracle ... but if you're seriously asking me > >>how this compares to MySQL, call me again when you've done your > >>homework". > >> > >> > > > >Actually, before saying anything in public about their products, check > >out what they require for use of their protected trademarks. > ><http://www.mysql.com/company/trademark.html> > > > >To wit, they indicate that: > > > > "The MySQL AB Marks may not be used in a manner or with respect to > > products that will decrease the value of the MySQL AB Marks or > > otherwise impair or damage MySQL AB's brand integrity, reputation or > > goodwill" > > > >It seems to me that presenting a benchmark that did not favor their > >product could be quite reasonably considered to be an "impairment" of > >their integrity, reputation, or goodwill, and therefore be something > >worthy of legal attack. > > > > > It depends on how it is presented. Basically you just don't offer an > opinion on the matter. > For example... > > MySQL was 10x slower than PostgreSQL in this test.... > > Instead you could use something like. > > We performed the following test. > > MySQL scored this much > PostgreSQL scored this much My guess is that what they are saying is that you can't make a program like: mysqlhelper without their permission. Using their mark in a review is fair use, and the only way they could get you is if you either failed to attribute it, or had signed a license with them saying you wouldn't do benchmarks, like how Oracle licenses their software.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: