Re: BUG #1065: JDBC DataSource Serializability
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1065: JDBC DataSource Serializability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401260716210.18726-200000@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #1065: JDBC DataSource Serializability ("PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 1065 > Logged by: R. Lemos > > The JDBC2 pooled datasource(org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.ConnectionPool), > although implements java.io.Serializable, cannot be correctly serialized. > Its superclass does not implement java.io.Serializable and have important > fields marked as private. The BaseDataSource class cannot be made Serializable because one of its subclasses (PoolingDataSource) cannot be serialized. The PoolingDataSource class has member variables which can contain active database connections which can't be persisted. > Either should the superclass be Serializable or its fields non-private > (protected, friend or public). > Simply marking the fields with a weaker access level won't magically persist them. This requires manually using writeObject and readObject. This problem also occurs in SimpleDataSource. I've attached the patch I've applied to the gborg cvs repository. Thanks for the report. Kris Jurka
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: