Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401220929100.25073-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bunch o' dead code in GEQO
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes: > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > >> The GEQO planner module contains six different recombination algorithms, > > > considering the recent discussion about REALLY slow query planning by the > > GEQO module, it might be worth testing each one to see which works best > > before lopping them off. > > I'm assuming that the original author of the GEQO code already did that > testing ... Hmmm. I was figuring he wasn't sure so he left them in for other people to test. Is this a part of the code that eats up much time, or something simple and fast that isn't part of the "GEQO takes 8 seconds to plan" problem?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: