Re: odd jdbc driver synchronization issue
От | Kris Jurka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: odd jdbc driver synchronization issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401051735360.6474-200000@leary.csoft.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: odd jdbc driver synchronization issue ("George Lessmann" <glessmann@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: odd jdbc driver synchronization issue
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, George Lessmann wrote: > > The original design of my test application allocated one Connection and > two CallableStatements per client (one for the parent insert and one for > the child insert). As I reported earlier, each client would then be > serialized, even though they each existed in their own > thread/connection/callablestatement. > > I then refactored the application to allocate a connection per client, > and prepareCall() before every execute(). This change resulted in each > client being able to concurrently access the database, even though, in > my opinion, it violates the whole reason behind a prepareCall() which is > to reuse it often without recompilation. I've attached a program I wrote to try and verify your claims. I see no serialization despite a single prepareCall and many executes. This program runs with java CallTest <num clients> <num runs per client> each client does a loop over numRuns, calling a SELECT stored procedure and then inserts that value into a table via another stored procedure. Let me know if you see a problem with this test or how your application differs. Kris Jurka
Вложения
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: