Re: Press Release
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Press Release |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310300741500.23153-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Press Release (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Rod Taylor wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >Why are you running a vacuum full -- forgot to do a regular vacuum often > > >enough? > > > > > No because if we don't run a vacuum full on this (actually a couple of) > > machine > > then the machine slows down to a crawl over time. Vacuums are run every > > 4 or 5 hours > > and a vacuum full every night. > > > > I am obviously missing something and relying on past knowledge. > > Yup.. Sounds like fsm is too low. Bump it up an order of magnitude and > vacuum hourly instead -- drop the FULL. I'd actually highly recommend the autovacuum daemon with moderately aggressive settings, i.e. have it come on and check every 5 or 10 minutes. On a table that's being updated many times a second, the needs for vacuuming can be very frequent. let the autovacuum daemon do it. You can schedule in mandatory plain vacuum s every couple of hours to make sure they happen if you're paranoide, but honestly, while the autovacuum daemon may technically be beta, it seems to be working for an awful lot of people with heavily updated sites.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: