Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310211445270.10899-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL
Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Justin Clift wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Jorg Janke (the "main" Compiere person) and I had a brief dicussion last > > year. > > > > Pretty much he asked if PostgreSQL (either the company and/or the > > community) would be interested in _making PostgreSQL compatible with > > Compiere_ or if not, then how about we and _make and maintain_ a fork of > > PostgreSQL that did the right kind of transaction support to work > > Compiere. The return for doing that would have been for PostgreSQL to > > the be Compiere "default" (recommended) database. > > It is hard to understand that if he is willing to make PostgreSQL the > default for Compiere, why he would refuse to include any changes to > allow Oracle and PostgreSQL to both work. But if what he wants is nested transactions, then I could see him paying for development providing better ROI than forking the code. Is that what was meant by "the right kind of transaction support" ?
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: