Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309241116410.15400-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations (Doug Quale <quale1@charter.net>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 24 Sep 2003, Doug Quale wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > scott.marlowe wrote: > > > > > > Someone on the list recently compared them, and linux came out marginally > > > faster than FreeBSD, but the difference was way less than what a faster > > > I/O subsystem, faster / more memory, or faster / more CPUs would make. > > > > That test was flawed because the user later reports that their IDE disks > > weren't using DMA on FreeBSD, while it was being used on Linux. He > > promised to report back. > > The results on the website were updated on August 28 to fix this flaw > and to incorporate some suggestions made on the pgsql-performance list > (see http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/postgresql.php). > > I don't know why he didn't report back to the list. He expressed the > desire that BSD benchmark faster than Linux, but the Linux numbers he > reports are still about 8-10% better than the FreeBSD numbers. Both > BSD and Linux are undergoing rapid development so this is pretty close > to even. I thought he HAD reported back to this list that he'd changed the settings. Not sure now, been a while.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: