Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309190949180.14562-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL) (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL)
Re: Rockets (was Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 00:30, Tom Lane wrote: > > "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes: > > > ... Being honest and fair will win > > > hearts and minds, and when they need the Saturn 4 instead of the Estes > > > rocket, they'll remember who to come to. > > > > I like this analogy, though maybe you've overstretched. Perhaps: > > > > MySQL = Estes. Put in InnoDB, and you have a D engine ... but it's > > still a model rocket. > > > > Postgres = Titan II. Can boost LEO missions or small interplanetary > > probes. Never mind its ICBM heritage ;-) > > All US (government) and Soviet/Russian rockets have ICBM roots. > > > Oracle = Saturn IV. Can take you to the moon ... if you can afford > > the price tag. > > What's a Saturn IV? Do you mean the Saturn V? http://www.aviation-central.com/space/usm50.htm
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: