Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)?
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309181531280.11124-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)?
Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote: > scott.marlowe wrote: > > >On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Duffey, Kevin wrote: > > > > > > > >>We are looking for information regarding any capabilities of PostgreSQL > >>in regards to scalability. Ideally we want to be able to scale in both > >>directions. What sort of solutions are out there for either or both > >>directions of scalability? Specifically, open-source solutions would be > >>most in need, but commercial applications are fine as well. > >> > >> > > > >As for horizontal scaling, you could look at ERserver for that. Setup one > >master writer and a bunch of slave boxes to handle the majority of the > >queries. There's not been a bunch of work into horizontal scaling really, > >with most of the clustering software for postgresql aiming at failover / > >high availability, not massive parallelization of read and / or writes. > > > Are there any databases that do well in horizontal scaling? What really > *IS* Oracle Real Application Clusters? I've heard Vax Clusters running RDB do well. TPF on a mainframe is highly recommended by Sabre, the Airline reservation folks. I've heard horror stories about RAC though. I don't think there's anysuch thing as an easily configurable high performance clustering solution. The better the run the more infrastructure (hardware, software, support) they seem to need.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: