Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309161444550.5612-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations ("John Allgood" <john@turbocorp.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations
Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, John Allgood wrote: > Hello > > I am looking for information on what operating systems and > filesystems people are running postgresql on. I have read so much on this I > decided to get some input from other people. I at first was leaning toward > FreeBSD and using its filesystem. We are a linux shop and love it. What are > thoughts on using ext3 or some other Linux filesystems is there really that > much performance difference by using ext3 v/s BSD/FS/UFS. Someone on the list recently compared them, and linux came out marginally faster than FreeBSD, but the difference was way less than what a faster I/O subsystem, faster / more memory, or faster / more CPUs would make. The differences between the different file systems wasn't all that great. Due to known data loss issues in early 2.4 kernels, my server was built with ext2 (it does sit on 3 UPSs and one diesel generator, so the chances of losing power are much lower than chances of losing a disk drive) a year and a half ago. Now that we're building replacement servers, we're gonna use ext3 on RH9 with the latest (from redhat) kernel. Build a big RAID5 or a medium size RAID1+0 with a good hw controller with battery backed memory for bet performance, or even linux software RAID to get the most out of your machine.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: