Re: Buglist
От | Roderick A. Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buglist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308190523480.28162-100000@main.cyber-office.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Buglist (Bo Lorentsen <bl@netgroup.dk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buglist
Re: Buglist |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 19 Aug 2003, Bo Lorentsen wrote: > Also have anyone tryed to compare the new transaction model in MySQL 4.x > to PostgreSQL ? Bo, I've recently started having to deal with MySQL. (Web sites wanting/using php _need/have-to-have_ MySQL. Their words not mine.) And from going from a "I dislike MySQL" to "I'm really hating MySQL" has been getting easier and easier. My dealings with MySQL are for the 3.xx version but I semi-followed a thread on this several months ago so feel fully qualified to to throw in my views. :-) My take on others research was that MySQL transaction model is a bubble gum and bailing wire add on not an integral part of MySQL. It _was_ tacked onto the top of the database so if either it or MySQL failed you were likely to loose data. > I'm looking forward to recive even more constructive arguements :-) How about "Friends don't let friends use MySQL"? Hopefully others with a stonger knowledge will provide this. Rod -- "Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: