Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0307221107340.19504-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On 21 Jul 2003 at 22:35, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > > > Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > > > > > e.g. Virtual private database? What is that? Unless I know what to expect out > > > of that functionality, how can anybody offer an opinion or material on that? > > > > > > A link explaining what is virtual private database would be great there. Like > > > http://www.oracle-base.com/Articles/8i/VirtualPrivateDatabases(VPD).asp. > > > > *That* is called a Virtual Private Database? It is just a fancy > > way to do row level security on a single table in the database. > > That article should be called "How to fake an updateable view > > with check option.". > > Well, no matter how you and me thinks this is not very relevant or of any > practical use, tons of people use it/will use it because oracle offers it to > them. > > Sigh... there are quite a lot of things that are not ideal. Definition of ideal > is one of them..:-) Reading that page, it looks to me as if VPD are just schema sections with security applied. I.e. Postgresql can do that.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: