Re: Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0307170851390.32083-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3 cygwin and PeerDirect beta4) on Win2k SP4 ("Markus Heinz" <markus.heinz@danet.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Markus Heinz wrote: > Hello, > > i'm evaluating Postgresql on win32 (winnt, win2k). I'm using a small java benchmark from FirstSQL (see attachments). > I've ran the benchmark on three pc's > 1) Pentium III 750 MHz Winnt Sp6a, 372 MB PC100 RAM, IBM 26GB HD 7200RPM > 2) Pentium 4 1.4GHz Win2k SP4, 256MB RRAM, WD 20GB HD 7200RPM > 3) Athlon XP 2400+ Win2k SP4, 512 DDR 266, Seagate 120GB HD 7200RPM > > using identical cygwin and PeerDirect configs on all PCs. > To my surprise the Pentium III on Winnt was three times faster than the Pentium IV 1.4 GHz > and two times faster than the Athlon XP 2400+. > Are there known problems with postgressql and Win2k SP4 ? No, Microsoft decided to basically change the preferred method for applications to talk to each other with the release of win2k. while Winnt had fast IPC, (the IPC that cygwin uses relies on it) 2k had much slower stock IPC. There are a few articles floating around the net about it. It's one of the reasons many older NT servers are still running, because the software running on them will be slower on machines running 2k and above.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: