Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0307031517360.22840-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver (Sam Barnett-Cormack <s.barnett-cormack@lancaster.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Seichter wrote: > > > > > > > Today memory isn't expensive so with 512MB I can be shure, every user on > > > > this server might have enough to work without any timeout or waiting times > > > > greater then 2 seconds. > > > > > > If the database is at all large, you really want more memory than that. > > > I have a really quite large DB, but I am *really* struggling with 1GB > > > > We went from 512 Meg to 1.5 Gig and the change was tremendous. That box > > ran Apache/Postgresql/auth_ldap/LDAP and now has 800 Meg of cache mem and > > about 120 Megs of buffer routinely. I'd heartily recommend even a jump > > from just 1 to 1.5 gig if you can make it. > > I want either a seperate (high-ish spec, high memory) box, or to not > have to use my workstation as a server :) But I don't think my employers > will put any more money into this project until it's fully finished. Well, always look at memory and drives. If you can add memory to your workstation is will be a much faster server. Adding drives into a RAID1 1+0 or 5 set can provide a performance increase too.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: