Re: Dependency tracking while dropping a database.
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dependency tracking while dropping a database. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0306101247040.13785-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Dependency tracking while dropping a database. (<mallah@trade-india.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 mallah@trade-india.com wrote: > > Hi, > > Shudnt' dependency tracking prevent one from dropping > a database that has tables in it? Not really. Dependency tracking is more for things like dropping indexes when the table that they depend on disappears, or dropping a sequence that was created with the serial keyword when the table is dropped. Preventing a database from being dropped is more the job of access control. I don't think there's any control over who can or can't drop a database except for the default database creator or superuser. Of course, since the superuser can type 'rm -Rf $PGDATA/*' you can't really deny him, just make him work harder to do it. I write a lot of scripts though, and don't want any default interfacing to have to get done to drop a database, so I'd prefer it be a non-default setting if any ever added the ability to deny / grant the creator or superuser the ability to drop a database. My intuition tells me that good backups and a test environment are the answer(s) to this problem.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: