Re: The best
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The best |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0306021023250.11997-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The best ("Saravanan Thulukanam" <saravanan@sapura.com.my>) |
Ответы |
Re: The best
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Saravanan Thulukanam wrote: > Can you experts out there tell me whether MySQL is great or PostgreSQL > is great. Yes, they are both great. MySQL is designed as a high speed data storage system with minimal relational capabilities and almost non-existent contraint capabilities. While they are adding some transactional features, MySQL is still far behind Postgresql in transactional terms. Postgresql is designed as a highly versatile relational database with a focus on getting the data right at all costs and providing the database developer with a feature full environment. While you can use Postgresql in the place of MySQL for many tasks, there are many tasks for which MySQL simply cannot replace Postgresql unless you're willing to do a large amount of coding outside MySQL to make up for the shortcomings. Since database speed has never been an issue for the stuff I do, I've never needed to sacrifice the rich environment of Postgresql for the faster one of MySQL in production.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: