Re: Backend memory leakage when inserting
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backend memory leakage when inserting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0305061440280.6450-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backend memory leakage when inserting (Gerhard Hintermayer <g.hintermayer@inode.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backend memory leakage when inserting
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Gerhard Hintermayer wrote: > Gerhard Hintermayer wrote: > > Should have investigated this better before posting: > > > > I have the following test case: > > PostgreSQL 7.3.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.95.2 (running > > a 2.2.23 kernel) > > create an empty database > > create table testdb(i integer,t timestamp); > > > > edit a file fill.sql with 500 identical lines: > > INSERT INTO testdb VALUES(1,'now()'); > > > > check memory of backend process (ps axuw): Column RSS 3224 > > \i fill.sql > > backend RSS 3295 (ok, some sort of basic mem probably) > > \i fill.sql ~ 10 times > > backend RSS 3300 > > \i fill.sql ~ 25 times > > backend RSS 3304 > > \i fill.sql ~ 70 times > > backend RSS 3316 > > > > VSZ value is always the same (6248). So what's going on here ? > > > > > > (now i have ~ 53500 tuples in my table) > > > > > > I have no idea, what's going on here ? Any ideas ? > > > > Gerhard > > Did compile postgreSQL (7.3.1) on a SuSE 8.1 box (Linux,2.4.19 kernel) > and see exactly the same behavior. Seems like the amount of leakage > depends on the size (number of tables, number of triggers ???) of the > whole database, on a empty database the memory growth rate is quite slow > (see posted example) , on the production system the mem usage was ~ 120 > MB after ~ 300000 inserts. How many shared buffers is your machine set to use? it may just be using them and it looks like a memory leak when it isn't.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: