Re: > 16TB worth of data question
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0304211647001.8043-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: > 16TB worth of data question (Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah@cs.earlham.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Shame, there's an E10k with 64 CPUs selling for $24,000 with no opening bid on ebay... Ends in 10. http://listings.ebay.com/pool2/plistings/endtoday/all/category41080/index.html?from=R11 Ummmmmmm 64 CPUs... On 21 Apr 2003, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: > The only issue with this is that it is difficult to recomend to our > clients who depend on bob and cuz'n joe to support their hardware. We > are kinda in the business of recomending the HW our clients need, and > not getting into the support side of it. Althoguh this might be a decent > option. > > > thanx, > -jj- > > PS. My office already this whole black and silver motif going on, and > purplely blue would kinda clash. > > > > On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 15:30, scott.marlowe wrote: > > On 21 Apr 2003, Jeremiah Jahn wrote: > > > > > I have a system that will store about 2TB+ of images per year in a PG > > > database. Linux unfortunatly has the 16TB limit for 32bit systems. Not > > > really sure what should be done here. Would life better to not store the > > > images as BLOBS, and instead come up with some complicated way to only > > > store the location in the database, or is there someway to have postgres > > > handle this somehow? What are other people out there doing about this > > > sort of thing? > > > > Then why not start right out on 64 bit systems? Low end 64 bit sparcs > > Ultra 60 type stuff) aren't too expensive, and debian and a few other > > flavors seem to run quite quickly on Sparc hardware. > > > > There's also 64 mainframe linux, and a couple of other 64 bit platforms > > that are fairly mature, IBM's Power Pc based systems run Linux as well. > > > > If you're gonna play with big datasets, that's the one time that 64 bit > > really starts to have advantages, and let's face it, you're gonna go there > > eventually anyway, might as well get a head start now. > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: