Re: Are we losing momentum?
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0304210927550.5883-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Are we losing momentum? (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Re: Are we losing momentum? Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 Apr 2003, Hannu Krosing wrote: > greg@turnstep.com kirjutas K, 16.04.2003 kell 16:51: > > The original poster had some > > valid points (auto-vacuum and non-intuitive commands) that still need > > addressing, IMO. > > As of 7.3 (or was it 7.2) auto-vacuum is just one line in crontab. In > many scenarios it can be left running continuously with very little > effect on performance. In others it must be run nightly, but having it > kick in at unexpected times may not be what you want at all. So it has > to be configured for good performance weather it is built-in or run in a > separate backend process. > > And I can't see how "show tables" is more intuitive than "\dt" - I > expected it to be "list tables" or "tablelist" or "näita tabeleid" . 'show tables' is SQL, and can be run from a script, with the output parsed. For some reason when I run a query of \dt from PHP I get an error. :-) > Once you have found \? it is all there (and you are advised to use \? at > psql startup). I love \ commands, but remember, those are psql commands, not postgresql commands. show tables would be a postgreSQL command the backend parser would understand. Apples and Oranges. > That may also be why PostgreSQL is more popular in Japan - if one has to > remember nonsensical strings, then it is easier to remember short ones But, how do I write an app to ask such questions easily? psql -E is not the easiest and most intuitive way to learn how to get the data into a structure for parsing in a client side app.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: