Re: PL/Java (was: stored procedures)
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/Java (was: stored procedures) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0303131525420.21667-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/Java (was: stored procedures) (Petre Scheie <petre.scheie@nextelpartners.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Petre Scheie wrote: > My DBA and I looked at the link on using SQL for stored procedures > (thanks Neil!) and he raised a couple concerns: > > 1. In the example given, the query is directed at just one table; he > says he needs to join multiple tables, and have it return a set. Can PG > do this? > > 2. The docs say this ability to return a set is deprecated and may be > removed in a future release. Why is that? Has this functionality been > replaced by something else (better?) > > Sorry if these are really dumb questions. We're trying to use pg > (instead of O or SS) but we're new to it. Sure, that's no problem. Has this guy read much of the docs yet? it's a worthy investment of time, and they're quite good: Main 7.3 docs page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=0&file=index.html Here's some marketing bullet points from the programmer's guide in 7.3: * User programmable and built-in functions * User extensible types, as well as a rich variety of built-ins * User definable operators * User definable aggregates * Rules * Triggers * Procedural Languages: ** PL/pgSQL ** PL/Tcl ** PL/Perl ** PL/Python ** PL/R (coming in 7.3) It's the best database you've never heard of (before now). :-)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: