Re: FreeBSD: SMP and PostgreSQL
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FreeBSD: SMP and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0302141317330.28786-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FreeBSD: SMP and PostgreSQL (Francisco J Reyes <fran@natserv.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: FreeBSD: SMP and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Francisco J Reyes wrote: > Moving from single CPU to Dual CPU with Raid gave me somewhere in the 20% > improvement. However, when we switched to Raid 0+1 on the same SMP box I > saw performance jump to almost 3 times faster. > > Although not exactly an answer to your question, but a testament that > a disk subsystem can be a real differentiator.. > > Also It realy would be best to wait until the 5.X branch has matured. I > may move my backup machine to 5 to give it a test/trial, but none of my > production machines are moving to it regardless of whether it is going to > be faster or not. Thanks for this info. I've just started playing with FreeBSD 5.0, and as my BSD experience is rather dated, I figured I'd just learn BSD5.0 while it matures and we'll both be ready to deploy in a few more months. :-) I've got to say it looks from this report as if BSD has a better disk subsystem than Linux in this regard, because there I was never able to get much better performance from multi-layered RAID than I could with whichever was the "slowest" layer method mixed in. I.e. if RAID1 was limited to X performance, and RAID0 was capable of 4X, then going to RAID 1+0 or 0+1 would only be X fast. Just to make it fun, I'm playing with it on an old Dual CPU PPro box that'll dual boot linux for comparison. Any tips for a newbie besides reading the online docs (which I'm in the middle of) ???
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: