Re: transactions
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0210211111430.21907-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: transactions ("Gregory Wood" <gregw@com-stock.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Gregory Wood wrote: > > > > They were confusing us with MySQL. It was a marketing guy. > > > > > > ... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-) > > > > So innodb is default now? > > Not when I built 3.23.52 a month or two ago. It wasn't even included in > installation. I'm tempted to add it, but I don't know if my eventual hosting > environment will include it, so I'm hesitant to do so. And don't forget, hot backups aren't free, they're either $400 a year or $1000 perpetual license, as per: http://www.innodb.com/hotbackup.html so, you can pay $1,000 to hot backup a database that has transactions bolted onto the side, or $0.00 for hot backups for a database that was built as a transactional engine from day one.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: