Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry?
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0210161322300.1431-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres-based system to run .org registry? (Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop@alert.infoplease.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The slashdot article: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/14/1720241&mode=nested&tid=95 The isoc page: http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/ the isoc proposal: http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/10-1.shtml the Oracle post: http://forum.icann.org/org-eval/gartner-report/msg00000.html Good day. On 16 Oct 2002, Karl DeBisschop wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:14, scott.marlowe wrote: > > It's on Slashdot, but there's only one post there that mentions the use of > > Postgresql. > > > > On 14 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > > > > > Yep, that's them. This is a big win from a PostgreSQL advocacy position, > > > especially since oracle pr made an official statement against the use of > > > PostgreSQL. Has this info hit any of the linux oriented news sites > > > (linux-today, slashdot, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL > > > marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release. > > Anybody have a link where I can find the /. or the Oracle statement? > > -- > Karl > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: