Re: A question on performance
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A question on performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0209161536220.929-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A question on performance (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 03:33:01AM +0000, Ron Harter wrote: > > > loadings and average sizes we can except anywhere from 700 to 900 updates > > per second. > > > Will postgresql be able to handle that many updates per second an a > > sustained basis (24/7)? > > You don't say what hardware you're planning on using. So a definite > "maybe". If your disk is fast enough and you have enough CPUs, you > should be able to handle it without too much trouble. But if you're > planning on running it on an old Pentium box with 16 Meg of memory, > you'll have a rough time ;-) Plus, if they're updates, not inserts, he's gonna need to schedule a vacuum to run almost continuously in the background. And he might wanna look at moving the pg_xlog directory to another drive
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: