Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the
От | Jeffrey W. Baker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0112281137540.23655-100000@windmill.gghcwest.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: postgres processes spending most of their time in the kernel
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org> writes: > >> It sounds like you have a build that's using SysV semaphores in place of > >> test-and-set instructions. That should not happen on x86 hardware, > >> since we have assembly TAS code for x86. Please look at your port > >> header file (src/include/pg_config_os.h symlink) and > >> src/include/storage/s_lock.h to figure out why it's misbuilt. > > > Well, it seems that one of __i386__ or __GNUC__ isn't set at compile time. > > I'm using GCC on i386 so I don't see how that is possible. > > I don't either. > > > It should be > > safe for me to simply define these two things in pg_config.h, I suspect. > > That is not a solution. If it's broken for you then it's likely to be > broken for other people. We need to figure out what went wrong and > provide a permanent fix. > > What gcc version are you running, exactly, and what symbols does it > predefine? (I seem to recall that there's a way to find that out, > though I'm not recalling how at the moment. Anyone?) GCC 2.95.3 on Slackware 8 i386. I just tried this program: #if defined __i386__ && defined __GNUC__ int main(void) { exit(); } #endif which builds and runs, so the problem must lie elsewhere. -jwb
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: