Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
От | Tille, Andreas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191303570.27841-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I personally would like to have index scans that look up heap rows > record the heap expired status into the index entry via one bit of > storage. This will not _prevent_ checking the heap but it will prevent > heap lookups for index entries that have been exipred for a long time. > However, with the new vacuum, and perhaps autovacuum coming soon, may be > little need for this optimization. > > The underlying problem the user is seeing is how to _know_ an index > tuple is valid without checking the heap, and I don't see how to do that > unless we start storing the transaction id in the index tuple, and that > requires extra storage. For my special case I think doubling main memory is about the same price as a MS SQL server license. I can´t say which further problems might occure. Kind regards Andreas.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: