Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
От | Alex Knight |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106271624050.18309-100000@blowfish.phunc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL ("Steve Wolfe" <steve@iboats.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Steve Wolfe wrote: > > > 1) Distribution of Linux to have the largest number of "out of the box" > > > security holes. Check back and look at the security reports. Count them > if > > > you insist. > > > > And check for the number of them being Red Hat specific. > > I consider things like the portmapper being enabled by default Red Hat > specific. > > > > 3) So much extra crap running to begin with, eating up extra memory, > cpu, > > > etc. > > > > You're obviously unfamiliar with it. > > I don't know, I generaly turn off at least half of the services that are > enabled by default, which free up quite a bit of memory. > > steve Yup, which is my point. On a 30 server deployment, and tight schedules, deploying Debian is much smoother, cleaner, more secure, and less "after install" configuration to do. It's like cooking a 3 course meal... then having to _bake a cake_ for desert. -Knight
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: