Re: Backup and Recovery
От | Matthew Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backup and Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106211050590.11353-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backup and Recovery (Naomi Walker <nwalker@eldocomp.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backup and Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Naomi Walker wrote: > >You are aware that you can still lose up to (by default) 16Mb > >worth of transactions in this scheme, I presume? > > I'm just starting with Postgresql, but, I thought with fsync on this > was not the case. Is that not true or what else did I miss? I suppose that it rather depends on how you expected to move the logs over. My approach was to archive the redo when PG is done with them and only then to roll them forward. If a catastrophe occurs, then I wouldn't be able to do anything with a half-full log. Our Oracle setups use redo logs of only 1Mb for this reason, and it doesn't seem to hurt too much (though Oracle's datafile formats seem a fair bit denser than Postgres's). Matthew.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: