Re: Backup and Recovery
От | Matthew Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backup and Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201212240.25630-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Backup and Recovery (Naomi Walker <nwalker@eldocomp.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Naomi Walker wrote: > Even more important that uptime to us, is to never put ourselves in a > position where we could lose data. I understand I can do a hot backup > with pg_dumpall. What we need on top of that is the ability to replay > the transaction logs against the previous database archive. Without > such a feature, even if I did a full backup a few times a day, we > would be vulnerable to losing hours of data (which would not be > acceptable to our users). This is what I'd like too (though I'm not that bothered about rolling forward from a dump if I can just do it by replaying logs onto real datafiles). I mentioned it a while ago: http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=114397 but got no response. You are aware that you can still lose up to (by default) 16Mb worth of transactions in this scheme, I presume? Matthew.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: