Re: Indexes not used
От | David Olbersen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Indexes not used |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.31.0103151519530.7826-100000@bubbles.electricutopia.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Indexes not used (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Indexes not used
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Just as an example, here's the query plan of the *SAME* query before and after a VACUUM ANALYZE Notice the way the two plans are *COMPLETELY* different. l_portal_statuses and b_portal_statuses only have *3 rows* right now, but there was no way for the planner to know that. Anyway, this should be evidence that a good VACUUM ANALYZE periodically is a Good Thing(tm). (BTW, the site that this database drives is now significantly more responsive) Before: ---------------------------------------- Merge Join (cost=97.62..170.37 rows=1000 width=110) -> Index Scan using l_portal_statuses_pkey on l_portal_statuses lps (cost=0.00..59.00 rows=1000 width=16) -> Sort (cost=97.62..97.62 rows=100 width=94) -> Merge Join (cost=22.67..94.30 rows=100 width=94) -> Index Scan using b_portal_statuses_pkey on b_portal_statuses bps (cost=0.00..59.00 rows=1000 width=16) -> Sort (cost=22.67..22.67 rows=10 width=78) -> Seq Scan on contracts c (cost=0.00..22.50 rows=10 width=78) After: ---------------------------------------- Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.47 rows=1 width=110) -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..2.40 rows=1 width=94) -> Seq Scan on contracts c (cost=0.00..1.34 rows=1 width=78) -> Seq Scan on b_portal_statuses bps (cost=0.00..1.03 rows=3 width=16) -> Seq Scan on l_portal_statuses lps (cost=0.00..1.03 rows=3 width=16) -- Dave
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: