Re: elog() patch
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog() patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0203011202220.687-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elog() patch ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: elog() patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD writes: > SQL92 has WARNING, would that be a suitable addition to NOTICE ? > INFO would not be added since it is like old NOTICE which would stay. > So, instead of introducing a lighter level we would introduce a > stronger level. (WARNING more important than NOTICE) > If we change, we might as well adopt some more SQL'ism. At the client side SQL knows two levels, namely a "completion condition" and an "exception condition". In the PostgreSQL client protocol, these are distinguished as N and E message packets. The tags of the messages are irrelevant, they just serve as a guide to the user reading the message. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: