Re: Databases compared at zend.com
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Databases compared at zend.com |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0106011103100.1356-100000@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Databases compared at zend.com (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Databases compared at zend.com
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> Good article. The only inaccuracy I saw was that he claims Postgres' > storage of large objects is "in the filesystem" and "inefficient". > >From my reading of the docs this is not true--large objects are stored > within the database just as with any other data. The programming > interface to LOs may or may not be clunkier than that of other > databases, but the storage is no less efficient. As the person who wrote it :) It was my understanding that PostgreSQL stores large objects on the filesystem outside of the database tables. They may be indexed but I thought there was only an identifier within the table that pointed to the large object. If this is not true, could someone please describe the actual process, I can update the article. Joshua Drake > > I thought about posting a comment on the article, but I didn't feel > like registering at Yet Another Website in order to do so. > > -Doug >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: